![]() | Message Board |
Posted by JeffK on February 23, 2008 at 11:05:19:
In Reply to: 1922 no D posted by Raymond on February 22, 2008 at 10:09:22:
It's hard to say without seeing in person, but I'd agree that a noticeable separation between the "L" and he coin's rim is a possible red flag. The same master appears to have been used for all cents in that period, and the "L" is always pretty much butted against the rim. Of course, a slight shift could always have occurred when your coin was struck, but I think an in-person exam is warranted.
P.S. - I'll put in a plug for using Firefox as your browser. Aside from being NotMicrosoft, it has a halfway decent spelling checker built in. It's saved me from "alot" and "seperate", and caught "cought" here...
: I came across a 1922 no d. Looks like the real deal pretty much, but I still think it's a fake. No d has no damage, so it was done pretty good. The thing that CAUGHT [cought] my eye though, was the 'L' in LIBERTY [Leberty] is not up against the rim. So that makes me think it's a fake. does anyone agree or disagree? How much is a fake 1922 no d worth? a couple bucks?